Monday, May 11, 2015

Meeting an Old Friend Unexpectedly


Robe, ca. 1700–1740. Eastern Plains artist, probably Illinois, Mid-Mississippi River basin. Native tanned leather, pigment. Paris (France), Musée du quai Branly, 71.1878.32.134

My wife and I visited the Metropolitan Museum of Art last Saturday to see the exhibit The Plains Indians: Artists of Earth and Sky on its last day before closing.  The exhibit was superb, and included many pieces from European collections that are seldom or never seen in this country.  http://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2015/plains-indians-artists-of-earth-and-sky


On our way out of the exhibit, we passed through the gift shop where I encountered an old friend. 


Copies of my Plains Indian Coloring book were on display. I was flattered to see that they were placed next to the exhibit catalog.  This was one of the first books I wrote and illustrated at the beginning of my career.  http://doverpublications.ecomm-search.com/search?keywords=David%20Rickman



As always, it's pleasant to meet an old friend unexpectedly.

Friday, May 1, 2015

Revisiting the Past in Pictures, Words and Objects

By combining eyewitness images with period documents and artifacts we can improve our understanding of what the past really looked like.  This can be done for any time or place in history when you have a conjunction of pictures, words and/or objects.  In this post, I’ll use all three to examine the dress of late-18th century Spanish California.

A.

In September of 1791, José Cardero, a young, self-taught artist, added two sketches at Monterey, California to a growing portfolio of images he’d made on the Spanish scientific expedition led by Alejandro Malaspina.

B.

Those portraits, and other pictures Cardero made during his visit, are our best pictorial evidence of how the men and women of early Spanish California dressed. And though they were made at the presidio, or fort, at Monterey and the nearby Mission San Carlos, the clothing and hairstyles are typical of what you would have found elsewhere in California at that same time.[1] 

We know this because details of their clothing are confirmed and sometimes explained by contemporary documents, especially the lists of supplies sent every year by sea from New Spain (Mexico) to California.

Unfortunately, the supply lists for Monterey have not been published, but those for the Santa Barbara Presidio have been, in a wonderful Spanish/English edition by the Santa Barbara Trust for Historic Preservation.  In addition, the Trust has conducted extensive archaeological investigations at their site, and a few of the pictures I’ll include come from this work.[2] 

C.

The couple, usually identified as a soldier and his wife, are probably wearing their best clothing, judging by the the woman's fabrics, ribbons, and lace and the fact that he sports a highly-decorated cuera, or leather armor.  We might even think that this is an officer and his lady, but the truth is that we just don’t know. The saw-edged bars above the man's coat cuffs look like rank insignia, but not much is known about how presidial soldiers indicated rank on their uniforms.

The woman’s bodice appears to be sleeveless (displaying the full, lace and ribbon trimmed sleeves of her chemise), fitting tightly to her torso and laced up the front.  It is trimmed at the bottom with some kind of tabs - perhaps gathered ribbon.  The lace at the bottom of the bodice is harder to explain.  Is this attached to the bodice or, since her sleeves are also trimmed, is her chemise shortened and worn outside the waistband of her skirt to show the lace?  Other details: she wears two forms of fichu - a black scarf and then a band with ruffled edge. The woman’s skirt could be of damask or printed fabric.  Both Chinese silk (saya saya) and printed cotton (indianilla) appear in the Santa Barbara Presidio supply lists.

My very great thanks to the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport, Kingdom of Spain; Museo de America, Madrid; and the Santa Barbara Trust for Historic Preservation for their generous assistance.

Excerpts from Supply Lists, Presidio of Santa Barbara, California
Invoice, San Blas, March 10, 1792.
150 pairs of side-lacing shoes (150,, pares de Zapatos de abotinar)*

Invoice: Mexico, February 24, 1788
4 pieces of superior printed cotton from Barcelona (4 Piezas Indianillas Superiores de Barcelona)

Invoice: Mexico, January 25, 1789.
8 dozen assorted medium grade neckerchiefs, mostly black (8,, Doz[ena]s Mascad[a]s de ½ m[ar]ca Surtidas abundando negras)

D.

7 dozen crimson stockings, embroidered on the side (7,, Dozenas de Medias Carmesi Bordadas àl Canto)

12 pieces of number 80 ribbon from Genoa, 32 varas, pearl and crimson (12,, P[ie]as Liston n[úmer]o 80,, de Genova de 32 v[ara]s Nacar, y Carmesi)

9 pieces [ribbon] number 40, blue and green, from Granada for lack of it from Genoa (9,, id[em] n[umer]o 40,, azul, y verde de Gran[a]da por falta del de Genova)

Invoice: Mexico, December 29, 1790
30 dozen shoes for men and women, the latter 6 and 7 point (30 dozen[a] Zap[ato]s para homb[r]e y Muger estos de 6,, y 7,, puntos)

90 pieces of fine, narrow genuine Brittany linen (90 Piezas Bretañas ang[osta]s lex[itimas] finas)

10 pieces of Chinese silk (10 piezas Sayasayas)

E.

6 bundles of blue glass beads (6,, Maz[o]s de Abalorio Azul)

6 bundles of large garnet beads (6,, d[i]chos Granate gordo)

12 varas of fine wide lace from Lorraine (12,, varas de Encaxe fino ancho de Lorena)

2 pieces of gold cloth ribbon (2 p[ie]zas liston de Tela de Oro)

2 pieces of watered ribbon, 1 pearl and the other black (2 d[i]chas Id[em] de Aguas 1 nacar y otra negra)


6 dozen fine black hats with low, flat crowns and silk lining (6. Dozenas Somb[rero]s neg[ro]s copa chata forro de seda)

90 pieces of fine, narrow genuine Brittany linen (90 Piezas Bretañas ang[osta]s lex[itimas] finas)

F.

F.


80 pairs of breeches of reinforced blue wool velvet, lined with common cotton fabric, pockets of dressed deerskin, and yellow buttons with loops (80 Pares calsones de Tripe azul reforzado, forrados en Manta Bolsas de Vadana y Boton Amarillo de Aza)

G.

60 blue chupas of cloth from Puruagua with cuffs and collar of 2nd grade scarlet cloth, plain yellow metal button, lined with common cotton fabric, sizes 2 and 3 (60,, Chupas de Paño az[ul] de Puroagua con buelta y collarín de paño grana de 2a. boton de metal Amarillo lisos forrad[o]s en manta de 2a. y 3a. talla)


10 pieces of Chinese silk (10 piezas Sayasayas)

Requisition: Santa Barbara, December 5, 1791

50 bundles of large green and dark blue glass beads (50,, mazes de Abalorio gordo verde y az[u] obscuro)


H.

30 pesos in imitation pearls (30,, p[esos?] en perlas de papelillo)

*I differ with the translation given in the Santa Barbara Trust publication.  Zapatos abotinados were described by later eyewitnesses as side-lacing shoes or ankle boots worn by horsemen.


Images:

A. "Soldier's Wife, Monterey," by José Cardero, 1791. Museo de America,
B. "Soldier of Monterey," by José Cardero, 1791. Museo de America,
C. José Cardero also painted the plaza at Mission San Carlos de Borromeo de Carmelo (Carmel Mission), California, 1791.  This detail shows what is probably a soldier without his cuera (civilian and military dress were nearly identical) and two women. Museo de America
D. A pair of embroidered stocking, Spanish, 18th century. Museo del Traje, Madrid.
E. Assorted glass beads excavated at site of the Presidio of Santa Barbara, California by the Santa Barbara Trust for Historic Preservation (SBTHP).
F. Brass button, back and front, roughly 3/4 of an inch in diameter. Note the loop (aza) on the back (SBTHP).
G. A decorated buckle (SBTHP)
H. Imitation pearls (SBTHP)

Notes:

[1] California’s three other presidios were San Francisco, Santa Barbara and San Diego.
[2] Giorgio Perissinotto, Catherine E. Rudolph and Elaine Miller, Documenting Everyday Life in Early Spanish California; The Santa Barbara Presidio Memorias y Facturas, 1779-1810 (Santa Barbara, California: The Santa Barbara Trust for Historic Preservation, 1998).  The supply lists for Monterey are not published, but are located in the Archivo General de la Nación in Mexico City. 





Tuesday, April 28, 2015

A Case of Mistaken Identity?

A.

According to family tradition, this is a portrait of María Ursula de Veramendi (1811-1833), who married the frontier adventurer James Bowie in 1831 when she was 19 years old and died tragically in a cholera epidemic just two years later along with her parents and two children.  But is the sweet faced young woman in this portrait really Mrs. Bowie?

The evidence for this identification rests solely on family tradition, but I believe that family traditions are seldom completely reliable.  How many of us have family albums where ancestors stare out at us but have no names because those who once knew and loved these people died long ago without leaving any record of who they were?  Worse still, how many pictures are misidentified by later descendants who think they know who that person was but in fact, don’t?

B.

I think that may have happened with this lady's portrait.  In 2001, the estate of Muriel Vernet Moore, the great-granddaughter of Rezin Bowie, came to auction. Rezin was the brother of the more famous James “Jim” Bowie, who died at the Alamo.  James Bowie’s portrait was the highlight of the auction and was sold to the State of Texas.

C.

I have not yet seen the catalog, but contemporary accounts say that the estate included several other family portraits, including those of Rezin’s wife, Margaret, and two of his daughters, Martha and Matilda.  Margaret (born 1796) was probably not the sitter for the portrait I am discussing, but one of her two daughters might have been.  From the above portrait of Margaret Bowie, one can perhaps find some family resemblance.  More on this presently. .  .

Aside from the fact that we don’t know whom the artist was it’s unlikely that the portrait was painted in Texas and perhaps not even New Orleans.  The skill of the artist here is comparable to those working professionally in the United States at this time, including George Peter Alexander Healy (1813 –1894), who is believed to have painted James Bowie’s portrait, probably in 1832 when Bowie traveled with his brother Rezin to the United States.  It seems unlikely that Jim Bowie took his young wife with him on this trip, since she was either pregnant or had recently given birth.  But if he did and Healy painted her portrait, too, why then would he have painted Mrs. Bowie in fashions that were still ten to fifteen years in the future?

D.

The fashions of 1832 and 1842 were really quite different.  In the late-1820s – early-1830s, women wore their hair elaborately curled and piled high on their heads and their dresses had puffed, full sleeves. 

 E. 

Similar fashions were followed even in Mexico and, most likely, by the Spanish-speaking elite women of Texas.

F.

 They were certainly the rage in New Orleans.

G.

And they filtered down into the middle and lower classes of American society.

H.

In contrast to the styles of the late-1820s to early 1830s, the fashions of the 1840s were more reserved.  Women’s hair was parted in the middle and combed to smoothly frame the upper face, meeting at the nape of the neck in a ponytail of curls or at the crown of the head in a bun.  Dress sleeves were tight and the V shape was seen increasingly in the front of the bodice, including the neckline.

I. 


How, then, is the portrait, said to be that of María Ursula de Veramendi Bowie, who died in 1833, dressed in the height of fashion for a period more than ten years after she was in her grave? 

Many people buy old portraits just because of their beauty, and this portrait is certainly beautiful.  But it’s also possible that the young woman, dressed in her best black silk, was an ancestor of Muriel Vernet Moore.  It could even be that she was one of her great-grandfather Rezin Bowie’s daughters.  Two of the portraits offered for sale in 2001 were of his daughters, Martha (birth date unknown) and Matilda Bowie (later Moore), who was born in 1816. In fact, because of the shared last name and the fact that Martha died at the age of 21, I believe that if this is a portrait of any member of Rezin Bowie's family, it is probably Matilda. 

J.

One point that makes this a bit more likely is that the sitter in this portrait wears a small cross at her neck.  A cross might be worn by anyone, of course.  But Rezin Bowie and his family were all Catholics, and it is just possible that the sitter for this portrait was one too.

There will be those who will still wish to believe that this is the portrait of Jim Bowie’s Tejana wife, and perhaps they will offer the kinds of arguments that I’ve heard in similar cases of questionable identification, such as "Texas had different fashions than Europe and the United States," "The portrait was painted from memory and the artist put the later fashions on her," or, my favorite, "Can you prove it isn't her?" It’s almost impossible to prove a negative, of course, but I’ve pointed out the anachronistic clothing and offered a more likely candidate. I believe that that is about all I can do for now. 

*My thanks to Kristi Hale for inviting me to discuss the identity of this portrait and for pointing out the resemblance between this portrait and Margaret Bowie.

Images:
A. Portrait said to be of María Ursula de Veramendi Bowie, from The Alamo.com.  http://johnwayne-thealamo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=160&start=1150

B. Portrait of James Bowie, c. 1832, believed to be by George Peter Alexander Healy, now the property of the State of Texas.  This portrait is listed on the website as having been painted c. 1820, but since Healy was born in 1813, he would only have been 7 years old. It was more likely painted during Bowie's trip to the United States in 1832. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Peter_Alexander_Healy#/media/File:Jimbowie.jpg

C. Portrait believed to be of Margaraet Bowie, wife of Rezin Bowie. The Alamo.com. http://johnwayne-thealamo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=160&start=1150

D. "Helen" a popular print from c. 1830, published by DW Kellogg & Co,  Connecticut. Library of Congress. 

E. This print of a Mexican lady and her son is by Claudio Linati, based on sketches he made ca. 1825-1826 in Mexico and published in his Trajes civiles, religiosos y militares de México (Paris 1828).

F. Portrait of a Young Woman, 1830. Frenchcreoles.com

G. "Rustic Dance After a Sleigh Ride," by William Sydney Mount, 1830. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. http://www.mfa.org/collections/object/rustic-dance-after-a-sleigh-ride-33204

H. Anonymous portrait miniature of an American woman, c. 1845. 3 American Portrait Miniatureshttp://aminports3.blogspot.com/2013/03/unknown-portrait-of-young-lady.html

I. Photograph of Anna R.L. Baker, ca. 1846. "1840s Fashion in Photographs," Pinteresthttps://www.pinterest.com/pocketmuseum/1840s-fashion-in-photographs/

J. Detail of the portrait said to be María Ursula de Veramendi Bowie, from The Alamo.com.  http://johnwayne-thealamo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=160&start=1150


Sources:
“Bowie items at auction,”  Tue, 5 Jun 2001. Rootsweb.com Subject: http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOWIE/2001-06/0991761942

Full text of Blade Magazine,” August 2001, Archive.org.

Geni.com, “Matilda Eleanor Moore (Bowie)”